Monday, September 12, 2011

youtube : The 2nd Assassination of JFK

The 2nd Assassination of JFK



The film focuses on the historical and future significance of American manned space flight and the importance of the United States remaining on the forefront of space discovery. 'The 2nd Assassination of JFK' commemorates the Florida Coast's pivotal role in human space discovery. The future of the Space Program is examined through thought provoking interviews with astronauts, NASA engineers, residents of the Space Coast in Florida, among others. With massive budget cuts from previous and current US administrations, the country will coon be losing our collective and genius workforce at the Kennedy Space Center. '2nd Assassination of JFK' brings to light the uncertainties surrounding the future of America in space, and how this uncertainty could be one of our most costly mistakes.

youtube movies : Wetboy

Wetboy




Wetboy is a compelling story of a professional assassin for the government that only wants to serve God and Country. He soon finds himself immersed in a world of lies, betrayals and corruption. This story not only encompasses the means by which he deals with this, but also its consequences.

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Miley Cyrus' Mature New Look

Either scripts and active content are not permitted to run or Adobe Flash Player version10.0.0 or greater is not installed.

Get Adobe Flash Player

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Eddie Murphy as host excites Oscar show producers

Let the Eddie Murphy Oscar party begin.
After the producers of the 84th Academy Awards confirmed that the comedian/actor would host the biggest night in movies Feb. 26, the jokes started flying.
"We're opening it with (Murphy) singing Party All the Time," says co-producer Brett Ratner. "I'm kidding."
But Ratner and co-producer Don Mischer promise that Murphy will provide a memorable and entertaining evening as host.
"I have never seen him not kill it when he does comedy," says Ratner. "There is no other way."
On that point he's serious.
"(Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences President) Tom Sherak told me when I took the producing job that everyone is going to say no to you when you ask them to host," says Ratner. "So I was mentally preparing myself."
Mischer, a longtime awards show producer, was skeptical that Murphy would agree to take on the commitment given his track record for other award shows. "We always ask him, but he always says no," says Mischer. "I said it would never happen."
Ratner was floored when Murphy's eyes lit up at the suggestion that he host.
"I was like, what? Are you kidding?" says Ratner. "I was completely shocked."
While Murphy's standup comedy always has been a bit raunchy, the producers stress the show will stay family-friendly.
"This guy was (in) Shrek," says Ratner. "He's done family movies for the past 10 years. He's done Oprah."
"He's very smart and knows this is very much of a family type of show," says Mischer.
Ratner also points out that Murphy is a cinephile. "He loves movies. They are his life."
Unlike past hosts, such as Hugh Jackman, Murphy will not sing on the program. "He's a great singer, but I wouldn't ask him to sing," says Ratner. "It's like asking a famous singer to do comedy. It's not a good idea."
But it's too early to know what will be on the program other than laughs. "We just got the job," says Ratner. "We haven't got into any details. We just know (Eddie's) into it."
Ratner is finishing work on the comedy Tower Heist, which he directed and stars Murphy.
"If you think directing a movie with him was a dream, this is really a dream," says Ratner. "This is the ultimate."

Source

Monday, September 5, 2011

1930s in film

The decade of the 1930s in film involved many significant films. 1939 was one of the biggest years (and still is one of the greatest years) in Hollywood.

Events

Many full-length films were produced during the decade of the 1930s. The 1930s were a decade of political turmoil and economic problems; the great depression had affected the entire world, and Europe was dealing with both the fallout of World War I and the economic hardships of the time, both of which resulted in the rise of fascist political movements. The uncertainty of the era resulted in widespread popularity of fantastical, escapist fare. Swashbuckling adventures and the safe scares of the Universal Horror films were highly successful during this period.
The studio system was at its highest with studios having great control over a film's creative decision. This included the creation of the Hay's Code, which was the first large scale attempt at organized censorship of Hollywood films.
This was also a decade in which many memorable stars made their careers and saw their earliest starring roles.
1930 also marks the beginning of what is considered to be the 'golden age' of Hollywood, a period which lasted through at least the 1940s.
Remakes: Following the switch to talking movies circa 1926/1927, many classic films were remade in the 1930s (and later), including Alice In Wonderland (1933), Cleopatra (1934), and The Prisoner of Zenda (1937).
Monsters: Among the numerous remakes and new films were the monster movies, with a wide spectrum of stereotypical monsters. Given that many of these films were produced by Universal, they are regarded as part of the 'Universal Horror' genre. The first of these films debuted in 1931, and consisted of Dracula, Frankenstein, plus Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, then a 1932 trio with The Mummy, Vampyr, and White Zombie, followed by a 1933 trio of King Kong, The Invisible Man, and Mystery of the Wax Museum. In 1935 appeared Werewolf of London and The Raven leading to 1939's The Hunchback of Notre Dame.
Sequels/spin-offs: Within 5 years of sound-films, sequel films and spin-off plots appeared, with The Son of Kong (same year, 1933), Bride of Frankenstein (1935), and Dracula's Daughter (1936), etc.
Stars: The 1930s saw the rise of some of the most well known performers in acting and film history. A number of actors launched their careers in the 1930s, while others from the previous decade continued to be well regarded. The aforementioned Dracula and Frankenstein films both launched the careers of Bela Lugosi and Boris Karloff, respectively. The two men would spend much of the decade starring in Universal Horror films. Actor Errol Flynn, best known for his role as Robin Hood, saw his first starring role in Captain Blood. The Marx Brothers, making their debut at the end of the silent era, rose to fame in the 1930s. Other stars of this era included Charlie Chaplin, Mae West, and child star Shirley Temple.
The Hay's Code and the end of the Pre-Code era': In response to a number of scandals in the 1920s, the studio's adopted a series of guidelines known as the "Hay's Code", after its creator Will H. Hays. Hays was the head of the Motion Pictures Producers and Distributors Association, which would later be renamed as the Motion Picture Association of America in 1945. Starting in 1927, Hay's began compiling a list of topics which he thought Hollywood should avoid. The code was revealed and implemented in 1930, but it was not until 1934, with the establishment of the Production Code Administration, that it was significantly enforced. Due to this delay in enforcement capability, the Pre-Code era of Hollywood is technically considered to last until 1934, despite the code itself being unveiled in 1930.
The specific date in which the Pre-Code era ends could be considered July 1, 1934. According to an amendment made on June 13, 1934, all films released after July 1 of that year had to receive a PCA certificate of approval.
After this, the code was stringently enforced, though various forbidden subjects became less taboo and thus regulations regarding them were gradually relaxed. The code would remain in effect until 1968, when it was abandoned entirely. It was then replaced by the familiar letter rating system.

List of films
The following is a partial list of films made from 1930 through 1939. (For more detail see each individual year in film.)
A
The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938)
The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes (1939)
The Alamo: Shrine of Texas Liberty (1936)
Alexander Nevsky (1938)
Alexander's Ragtime Band (1938)
Algiers (1938)
Alice in Wonderland (1933)
All Quiet on the Western Front (1930)
Angels with Dirty Faces (1938)
Animal Crackers (1930)
Anna Christie (1931)
Anna Karenina (1935)
Anthony Adverse (1936)
Anything Goes (1936)
At the Circus (1939)
The Awful Truth (1937)
 B
Babes in Arms (1939)
Babes in Toyland (1934)
Beau Geste (1939)
La Bête Humaine (1938)
Bezhin Meadow (1935–1937)
The Big Trail (1930)
The Black Cat (1934)
Blonde Venus (1932)
The Blood of a Poet (1930)
The Blue Angel (Der Blaue Engel) (1930)
Borderline (1930)
Born to Dance (1936)
Boudu Saved from Drowning (1932)
Bride of Frankenstein (1935)
Bright Eyes (1934)
Bringing Up Baby (1938)
Broadway Bill (1934)
Broadway Melody of 1936 (1935)
Broadway Melody of 1938 (1937)
The Buccaneer (1938)
Bullets or Ballots (1936)
C
Camille (1936)
Captain Blood (1935)
Carefree (1938)
The Cat Creeps (1930)
Cavalcade (1933)
The Champ (1931)
Charge of the Light Brigade (1936)
Child Bride (1938)
China Seas (1935)
Cimarron (1931)
City Lights (1931)
Cleopatra (1934)
Clive of India (1935)
Come and Get It (1936)
The Crusades (1935)
D
Dames (1934)
Dancing Lady (1933)
Danger Lights (1930)
Dante's Inferno (1935)
Dark Victory (1939)
David Copperfield (1935)
The Dawn Patrol (1938)
A Day at the Races (1937)
The Dentist (1932)
Destry Rides Again (1939)
Dinner at Eight (1933)
Doctor X (1932)
Dodge City (1939)
Dodsworth (1936)
Dracula (1931)
Dracula's Daughter (1936)
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1931)
Drums Along the Mohawk (1939)
Duck Soup (1933)
E
Easy Living (1937)
Ecstasy (1933)
The Emperor Jones (1933)
F
A Farewell to Arms (1933)
The Fatal Glass of Beer (1933)
Feet First (1930)
Flying Down to Rio (1933)
Follow the Fleet (1936)
Footlight Parade (1933)
The Four Feathers (1939)
Frankenstein (1931)
Freaks (1932)
G
The Gay Divorcee (1934)
George White's 1935 Scandals (1935)
Gift of Gab (1934)
Go Into Your Dance (1935)
Going Hollywood (1933)
Gold Diggers of 1933 (1933)
Gold Diggers of 1935 (1935)
Gone with the Wind (1939)
The Good Earth (1937)
Goodbye, Mr. Chips (1939)
The Gorilla (1939)
Grand Hotel (1932)
Grand Illusion (1937)
The Great Ziegfeld (1936)
Gunga Din (1939)
Gulliver's Travels (1939)
H
Hell's Angels (1930)
History Is Made at Night (1937)
Honolulu (1939)
Horse Feathers (1932)
The Hound of the Baskervilles (1939)
The House That Shadows Built (1931)
The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1939)
Heidi (1937)
I
I Am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang (1932)
I'm No Angel (1933)
Imitation of Life (1934)
In Old Chicago (1937)
The Informer (1935)
Intermezzo (1939)
The Invisible Man (1933)
Island of Lost Souls (1933)
It Happened One Night (1934)
J
Jesse James (1939)
Jezebel (1938)
K
Kid Galahad (1937)
King Kong (1933)
The Knife of the Party (1934)
L
Ladies in Love (1936)
The Lady Vanishes (1938)
Libeled Lady (1936)
The Life of Emile Zola (1937)
Little Caesar (1931)
Little Women (1933)
Lost Horizon (1937)
Love Affair (1939)
Love Me Tonight (1932)
The Lower Depths (1936)
M
M (1931)
Mad Love (1935)
Madam Satan (1930)
Manhattan Melodrama (1934)
Mata Hari (1931)
Maytime (1937)
Men in White (1934)
Méphisto (1930)
Metropolitan (1935)
Midnight (1939)
The Milky Way (1936)
Min and Bill (1931)
Modern Times (1936)
Monkey Business (1931)
Morning Glory (1933)
Morocco (1930)
The Most Dangerous Game (1932)
Movie Crazy (1932)
Mr. Deeds Goes to Town (1936)
Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939)
The Mummy (1932)
Murders in the Rue Morgue (1932)
Mutiny on the Bounty (1935)
My Man Godfrey (1936)
Mystery of the Wax Museum (1933)
N
The New Gulliver (1935)
A Night at the Opera (1935)
Ninotchka (1939)
À nous la liberté (1931)
O
Of Mice and Men (1939)
The Old Dark House (1932)
One Hour with You (1932)
One Hundred Men and a Girl (1937)
Only Angels Have Wings (1939)
P
The Painted Veil (1934)
Pépé le Moko (1937)
The Petrified Forest (1936)
The Plainsman (1937)
Platinum Blonde (1931)
The Plow That Broke the Plains (1936)
Port of Shadows (1938)
The Prince and the Pauper (1937)
The Prisoner of Zenda (1937)
The Private Lives of Elizabeth and Essex (1939)
The Private Life of Henry VIII (1933)
The Public Enemy (1931)
Q
Q Planes (1939)
Queen Christina (1933)
Queen High (1930)
Quick Millions (1931)
R
Ramona (1936)
The Raven (1935)
Reefer Madness (1936)
Revolt of the Zombies (1936)
The River (1938)
Roberta (1935)
Romeo and Juliet (1936)
Room Service (1938)
Rosalie (1937)
The Rules of the Game (1939)
S
San Francisco (1936)
Seventh Heaven (1937)
Sex Madness (1938)
Shall We Dance (1937)
Shanghai Express (1932)
She (1935)
She Done Him Wrong (1933)
The Sign of the Cross (1932)
Skippy (1931)
Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937)
Son of Frankenstein (1939)
The Son of Kong (1933)
Stagecoach (1939)
Stanley and Livingstone (1939)
State Fair (1933)
A Story of Floating Weeds (1934)
The Story of Louis Pasteur (1936)
The Story of Vernon and Irene Castle (1939)
Swing Time (1936)
T
A Tale of Two Cities (1935)
Tarzan and His Mate (1934)
Tarzan Escapes (1936)
Tarzan Finds a Son! (1939)
Tarzan the Ape Man (1932)
The Testament of Dr. Mabuse (1933)
Tevye (1939)
Thank You, Jeeves! (1936)
The Thin Man (1934)
Things to Come (1936)
Three Texas Steers (1939)
Top Hat (1935)
Tower of London (1939)
Treasure Island (1934)
Trouble in Paradise (1932)
U
Under the Roofs of Paris (1930)
Union Pacific (1939)
V
Vampyr (1932)
W
Werewolf of London (1935)
White Zombie (1932)
Wife vs. Secretary (1936)
The Wizard of Oz (1939)
Wuthering Heights (1939)
Y
You Can't Take It With You (1938)
Young Mr. Lincoln (1939)
Source

Source

Sunday, September 4, 2011

download free Torrent dvd and blue-ray 3D Movies

                                     RARBG

Saturday, September 3, 2011

The Guard (2011) : Review

title image 
Back in the early 80s producer Joel Silver devised a simple formula for success: you take a white guy and a black guy with completely different backgrounds, give them a mystery to solve together, have them take part in a few action sequences, say a couple of funny lines, and then you rake in the cash. The method worked for years, as films like Lethal Weapon, 48 Hours, and more went on to have incredible box office success. Now writer/director John Michael McDonagh has taken that formula, given it an Irish twist, and created one of the best comedies of the year.

Featuring great turns by its stars, terrific chemistry between its leads and an unorthodox approach to a familiar set-up, The Guard is a screamingly hilarious comedy with heart. Taking an equal-opportunity-offender approach, the film is a dark comedy in every sense of the word, but everyone will be too busy laughing to care about the boundaries being pushed.

The story centers on Sergeant Gerry Boyle (Brendan Gleeson), a police officer who serves in the West of Ireland. Upon learning that a team of three international drug smugglers (Mark Strong, Liam Cunningham, David Wilmot) are in town, Boyle is forced to team up with an FBI agent named Wendell Everett (Don Cheadle) in order to bring them to justice. Though they resist working with each other at first, Boyle and Everett are unified after witnessing a wave of corruption, bribery and blackmail and refuse to back down until the job is done.

The greatest reason for the film’s success is the pairing and dynamic between Gleeson and Cheadle. Because their characters are so deftly written and layered, all aspects of Boyle and Everett’s personalities bounce off each other perfectly without ever feeling like a tired Odd Couple shtick. From Boyle’s casual racism to Everett’s wealthy upbringing; Boyle’s lack of worldliness to Everett’s fish-out-of-water situation, everything about the two is crafted with purpose and makes the film all the funnier.

Beyond the script, however, The Guard’s entire cast also gives amazing performances. As Boyle, Gleeson is required not only to be a bit of a schlub who, but, thanks to scenes with his dying mother, also a good and responsible man. The range shown in each actor’s performance is absolutely brilliant. The film’s real scene stealer, though, is Mark Strong as a criminal who has become bored by what he does. Strong has been frequently typecast as the stereotypical villain in the last few years and here he shows that he can play deep and complex characters when given the right material.

Because of John Michael McDonagh’s relationship to Martin McDonagh – they’re brothers – and the fact that both films star Brendan Gleeson, The Guard is likely to earn a lot of comparisons to In Bruges, which isn’t entirely unfair. Both movies aim for the same audience, have similar senses of humor and adroitly mix darker character and story elements with hysterical ones. There are, of course, some sections of the audience that won’t take kindly to McDonagh’s brazen and unabashed approach to comedy, but those that are appreciate irreverent humor and like feeling a little bad when they laugh are going to absolutely love The Guard

The Devil's Double(2011) : Review

title image 
When we were children our parents told us there’s no such thing as monsters. In the sense that there’s no mythical furry, fang-toothed, sharp-clawed beast under the bed or in the closet this is true, but this world is filled with monsters. Evil exists. There are people on this planet who live without moral compass or boundaries, men who feed on hate and terror. For years Uday Hussein, son of dictator Saddamn Hussein, wreaked his own personal brand of horror on the people of Iraq and now director Lee Tamahori has brought that malevolence to a personal level with The Devil’s Double.

Featuring a stunning dual performance by star Dominic Cooper, the film is a brutal and often hard to watch look at what happens when unfettered power is given to an absolute psychopath. Though it drags in the third act and has a fairly predictable plot structure (and I don’t just mean because it’s based on a true story), Devil’s Double is gripping when it needs to be, enough that it’s held together by an intense dynamic between two main characters.

Set in 1987, Iraqi army lieutenant Latif Yahia (Cooper) is sent from the battlefield to Saddam Hussein's palace where a former classmate, Uday Hussein (also Cooper), asks that Latif become his “fiday,” or body double. Told that his family would be killed if he refuses, Latif agrees, but soon becomes witness to Uday’s gruesome nature. The Black Prince’s daily life is filled with drugs, rape, torture and murder. Unable to take any more, he tries to escape, but it comes at an incredible cost.

The Devil’s Double is driven almost entirely by Dominic Cooper’s memorable turn as both Latif and Uday. Though there are differences between the two that help viewers tell them apart – they have different voices and teeth – it ends up not mattering, as Cooper communicates which person he is via body language alone. The two men can be in the same room, wearing the same clothes, standing perfectly still and yet you’ll have no trouble picking out which one is which. Though each character is different and complex, Cooper completely embodies each one he seamlessly interacts with himself. You’ll never consciously feels like you’re watching Dominic Cooper play two roles, which is everything you can ask for in a film made like this one.

While both hero and antagonist are stunning in the depth of their portrayal, the film suffers in story and structure. Though The Devil’s Double contains powerful scenes, they serve to construct characters rather than story, which is a format almost too simple to sustain itself. It doesn’t take much more than Uday slicing open a man’s stomach with a machete to understand why Latif would want to escape, yet a great deal of the film is dedicated to showing the prince’s crimes against humanity as a way to increase the script’s intensity level. While effective, it doesn’t help a lagging plot. Even the romantic interest, played by Ludivine Sagnier, feels more like an excuse to have Latif interact with another character, than part of the story as a whole.

Also questionable is the film’s crisp, clean cinematography. On one level it suits the gilded cage motif – a man given everything he could want but also hopelessly trapped – but also runs in contrast to the film’s tone, which because of the content, is black as night. It doesn’t do the movie any favors and, in a way, becomes a distraction. While I wouldn’t advocate a “grindhouse” style for the film, something in between would be apropos and might have made already extreme scenes all the more so.

The Devil’s Double is kept afloat by Dominic Cooper’s fascinating performance. Missing this would mean missing one of the most brilliant acting displays of the year and while the film feels deeply flawed, Cooper is worth the price of admission. 

The Change-Up (2011) Review

title image 
The Change-Up exists in a still relatively new kind of comedy genre, popularized most recently by The Hangover. Before The Hangover most funny movies fell into one of two categories: cartoony or realistic. Realistic comedies try to mine the minutiae of every day life and usually will only stretch that reality so far. Cartoony ones put their characters in ridiculous situations, using just about anything and everything no matter how ridiculous, to make the audience laugh. Part of the reason the original Hangover worked so well is that it did a better job of finding that middle ground between those two extremes than any movie before it, existing in a world we could all identify and relate to… but that also might have Mike Tyson’s tiger locked in a bathroom. The Change-Up continues that tradition better than any other comedy this year, by existing in a story created by an utterly cartoonish body-switching premise while still finding the reality of problems in every day life created by that piece of ridiculousness. As it did for The Hangover, it works brilliantly here.

Much of the genius in the better work of Change-Up director David Dobkin has always been in knowing when to stop. With The Wedding Crashers, which skewed more towards the realistic, he made his lead characters douchey enough to have fun with them, but never douchey enough that we ended up hating them. That same philosophy is in effect here, when a married man named Dave (Jason Bateman) wishes he could be free of his stifling life and a single man named Mitch (Ryan Reynolds) wishes he didn’t have to sleep in and bang so many hot women. Ok actually Mitch really just wishes he wasn’t so alone. Mitch and Dave are friends, and one night they end up peeing in a fountain wishing they had each other’s lives. In the morning they wake up, and they do.

Don’t get hung up on the specifics of the Freaky Friday premise, The Change-Up exists in our reality where we’ve all seen a bunch of body switching movies. It’s more interesting in having fun with Mitch and Dave’s situation, and so it sets about dropping them into each other’s lives. It must be said that both Ryan Reynolds and Jason Bateman are brilliant comedic actors, but actors from different schools. Bateman is usually best playing stiff and uptight, while Reynolds is loose and sarcastic. Neither is, however, particularly gifted at mimicry so when they switch bodies the differences in their performances are, admittedly minimal. Reynolds does the best at attempting to pull off some of Jason Bateman’s mannerisms, but Bateman, despite efforts to the contrary, is still basically just Jason Bateman. You won’t care.

You won’t care because no matter who they’re playing both Bateman and Reynolds have wickedly perfect comedic timing coupled with great acting insticts. The Change-Up contains at least three huge laughs pulled off by virtue of their performances alone. It should be said that the script they’re working with here is at best merely mediocre, but Dobkin’s directing and the performances he gets from his incredibly gifted actors lift this story to a completely different level.

That level is more than simply funny, it’s smart too. The movie’s anchored by yet another great performance from Leslie Mann, as Dave’s long suffering and neglected wife. There was a big pitfall here, a lesser movie would have turned the character into another one of those unsympathetic nags desperate for her husband’s attention. Dave’s a workaholic and most of the conflict between them comes from his absenteeism. But The Change-Up’s too good to go there. Missing is that moment when Leslie’s character threatens to leave if Dave doesn’t stop working, in its place is a moment of heartfelt honesty in which she confesses that his drive and determination is part of why she fell in love with him, and worries whether those same things she loves about him will prevent him from ever being truly happy.

The Change-Up is more than funny, it’s smart and interesting too. It’s not a Judd Apatow movie, it’s not that poignant, but it capably walks that line between over the top comedy and sympathetic subtlety the way few other comedies are able to do. It does all of that in a world full of rated-R topless scenes, shit jokes, and computer-generated knife-wielding babies. Pulling this movie off is no mean feat, but it was worth the effort, even if it’s not perfect. Olivia Wilde’s character (though utterly charming) ends up as kind of a dead end and Ryan Reynolds’ Mitch never seems to get the same neat bookend that Jason Bateman’s Dave does. Still, The Change-Up works so well that it easily overcomes most of those problems and stakes a claim as one of the funniest movies of the summer. 

Magic Trip : Review

title image 
There is perhaps no period in the history of the United States more simultaneously reviled and glorified than that which occurred between roughly the years 1966 and 1970. Enraged by the war in Vietnam, pissed off at the complacency of the previous generation and above all else, a bit bored, millions of Americans turned on, tuned in and dropped out. If that phrase seems ambiguous now, I assure you nothing has been lost in translation. There never was one specific definition, at least not after it left Timothy Leary’s lips, and in a way, that explains why the Summer of Love gave way to moustaches, high gas prices and eventually, the Me Generation.

Like nearly every ideology, ism or philosophical stance, hippydom was conceived, proposed and nurtured by highly intellectual men. Timothy Leary had a PHD and regularly guest lectured at Harvard. Abbie Hoffman quoted Thomas Paine and Abraham Lincoln during several trials in which he acted as his own attorney. And Ken Kesey, the inspiration, monetary backer and protagonist of this entire Magic Trip, wrote One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest, arguably, the single greatest novel to come out of the 1960s. Separately, each railed against societal norms, advocated drug use and preached a doctrine of expanding the mind, but together their message only served to fashion a generation into Lost Boys. The free wheeling madness each man rode to greater achievement couldn’t possibly have worked for everyone. Drop out may have meant succeed under your own conditions to Leary, but it was perverted and exploited by millions more to waste years of their lives. Sweeping change is messy and filled with unintended side effects. The further the message gets away from the speaker, the less control he or she has over its utilization. As Ken Kesey later put it, “once Pandora’s box opens, you can’t regulate who gets to use the stuff that comes out of it.” Of course, this all became clear later, well after he packed a bus full of optimistic intentions, acid and nearly a dozen people.

Slathered with vibrant murals and commentaries on Barry Goldwater, that bus, christened “Further” was purchased by Ken Kesey in 1964. He needed transportation to the World’s Fair in New York City, and with friends and acquaintances up for a road trip, the wheeled, multi-colored behemoth became the best option. Alison Ellwood and Alex Gibney’s documentary Magic Trip: Ken Kesey’s Search For A Kool Place tells the story of that ensuing journey and its aftermath. Beset by numerous breakdowns, both vehicular and mental and numerous buoys, both joyful and ideological, the abbreviated voyage is worth riding along with, if only to see how muddled a beautiful vision can quickly get.

For Ken Kesey, that vision was originally to wrestle in the Olympics. He may well have realized it, but a devastating shoulder injury cut his career short, shifting his focus toward graduating from the University of Oregon with a journalism degree. It was during his time in college that he volunteered for a secretive experiment in which the CIA administered him with doses of LSD. His life was never the same. He took a job at a mental hospital, started taking acid on a semi-regular basis and published One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest. With his newfound fame and resources, the author became a sort of guru to and magnet for strange and exciting characters on the west coast. These fellow outcasts were dubbed the Merry Pranksters, and they were about as eclectic and bizarre a group as you could possibly get.

Among the colorful and exciting lot were a Stanford professor, a former soldier and Neal Cassady. At the time, Cassady was, of course, famous in his own right. Portrayed as Dean Moriarty in Jack Kerouac’s bestseller On The Road and cited as the hero of Allen Ginsberg’s wonderful text Howl, Neal Cassady interacted with and inspired an entire generation without ever really creating anything lasting himself. He was like a muse for chaotic and brilliant upheaval, and perhaps more importantly for the Merry Pranksters, he knew how to drive a bus. Serving as conductor the entire way to New York, Cassady led the heroes, each with his or her own goal or purpose, into the further.

The stated end was the World’s Fair, but as with most road trips, the drive itself turned into the real story. It’s told through archival footage the Pranksters shot themselves. They wanted to make their own movie about the Magic Trip, but the dozens of hours never really got edited into anything usable, at least until Alison Ellwood and Alex Gibney came along. With so much to choose from, the co-directors easily could have shaped the events into something they were not. Many probably would have preferred if they did, but the resulting product would have been a lie and inherently unfair to those who sat shotgun on that thundering machine.

Like the Pranksters themselves, the Magic Trip was a disorganized mess filled with good times, bad trips, arrests, enjoyable excursions and beautiful moments of clarity. Kesey and several of his mates had the time of their lives. Another ended up in the psych ward. Still another got off almost immediately and a third became scarred and disenfranchised by the actions of the others. That a similar experience could treat many so differently shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone, but it is, nonetheless, a telling moment about the 1960s. Everything has a price, even that which is called free. One person’s utopia is another’s hell. Chaos only works for a certain type of person. Much of that anarchy is noticeable in this film. The narration is a bit disorganized, the graphics are occasionally a bit off-putting, but its heart is in the right place and its subject matter is interesting and factual. I would have had an awful time on that bus, but I’m still a more informed knowing what happened. 

Glee: The 3D Concert Movie : Review

title image 
Is Glee: The 3D Concert Movie the most cynical example yet of the 3D concert movie fad? Before you answer this, remember that the mini-genre has included a posthumous presentation of Michael Jackson's rehearsal footage, rushed into theaters barely three months after his death, and a biopic of the 17-year-old Justin Bieber. I've seen both of those concert movies, and I promise you neither felt as manufactured, calculated, and plain ugly as Glee 3D, which bungles everything that's basically appealing about concerts, movies, 3D technology and even the TV show Glee itself.

There's a touch of surrealism to the whole thing, as not only are the show's actors performing in character onstage-- Kevin McHale in his wheelchair as Artie, Naya Rivera flirting with the audience as Santana-- but in backstage interviews too. That means that, even as you glimpse fans in the crowd holding signs saying "I love you Lea Michele," Michele herself is backstage talking to the camera as Rachel Berry. Heather Morris sits in a chair getting her hair curled by a personal stylist an Indiana teenager could never afford, but speaks about the concert and herself as if she's her character, Brittany. The ruse pays off only occasionally-- Michele is particularly adept at improvving to the camera in character-- but feels howlingly artificial and patronizing, as if the producers honestly don't think Glee's core audience can tell the difference between the show and real life.

Even more mysteriously, the in-character bits from the stage show-- including video appearances from Matthew Morrison and Jane Lynch-- are cut almost entirely. We get an occasional shot of Kurt telling off Brittany or Santana gloating in the choir room, but otherwise there's no narrative to link together the musical numbers, which all originated at some point as part of a story on a given episode of Glee. If you're a hardcore fan of the show-- and, let's face it, anyone who sees this movie will be-- you'll get why a certain someone shows up to sing Cee-Lo's "Forget You" or why Brittany puts on a full Britney Spears outfit for "I'm A Slave 4 U." But numbers that feel hollow and overproduced in the context of the TV show feel unbearably dull here divorced from any kind of story, the cast cavorting around with back-up dancers looking no more distinguished than some late-era revival of The Mickey Mouse Club.

The one exception, the one bunch willing to embrace the inherent dorkiness that shiny, super-popular Glee pretends to represent, is the Warblers. They're a group of scrubbed-up guys singing harmonies in stuffy blazers, looking like every college a cappella group you've ever seen, and performing with natural charisma and confidence that the audience immediately responds to. It helps that their leader is Darren Criss, hugely talented and undeniably sexy; interviews with the audience show both boys and girls screaming their affections for Criss's character Blaine, who is Kurt's boyfriend, and watching him move is like seeing a brand-new, pansexual sex symbol being born before your eyes. I'd say he's reason enough to see the movie, but as old episodes of Glee and Criss's own musical efforts are easily available online, even that's not enough of a selling point.

Perhaps because the backstage interviews are so thin, director Kevin Tancharoen also weaves in interviews with a handful of hardcore Glee fans, who include a popular cheerleader who also happens to be a dwarf, a hardcore Brittany fan who also happens to have Asperberger's, and a boy empowered by Kurt to-- you guessed it-- come out of the closet. Undoubtedly Glee has had a positive effect on many of its millions and millions of fans, and watching pre-teen girls squeal in the audience has a certain timeless appeal. But all the heartfelt testimonials about how Glee changed these kids' lives feels self-congratulatory, and too conveniently tied to the show's self-appointed status as the great, powerful voice against bigotry in our culture. There's only so many times you can hear a show claim to stand for the little guy while reaping millions and millions in merchandising before the words start to sound false.

Barely making any use of the 3D effects and boasting musical numbers that aren't all that different from the lavish productions featured each week on the show, Glee 3D is no improvement on the show available each week for free on television, and for that reason feels like even more of a naked cash grab than all the other 3D concert movies that have come before it. I understand why thousands of fans came out for the live performances, I really do, but none of that appeal is captured here. 

Final Destination 5 (2011) Review

title image 
The Final Destination series started out as a fairly serious horror movie built on a creative premise. Unlike just about any other horror franchise, the movie’s killer would not ever take tangible form. Instead the villain is death itself, as if death is an active force, which claims lives on schedule that must not be broken. It’s a brilliant horror premise and one the franchise has done a lot of good things with over the years, even if as it’s worn on the whole thing has gradually begun to take itself less seriously, to the point that now the deaths are generally ridiculous. As it turns out, that ridiculousness is half the fun of this horror franchise and while even that had begun to run out of gas in the previous installment, Final Destination 5 injects new life into this premise with a few fresh ideas.

First though it plods through a bunch of awkward character development. Great movies let you learn about their characters naturally, as the plot develops. This one has all the characters involved walk up and conveniently reveal everything you need to know about their personality to each other in the movie’s first five minutes. It does that to get it out of the way so we know which character’s to care about when it starts killing them, and it does that because it knows it’s not deep enough to do that same thing while they’re being killed. Nor is it particularly well acted, the cast is a mixed bag of stiffs and mawkish caricatures. None of that matters because while the script and the cast is all but useless when it comes to characters, Final Destination 5 is nearly pretty great at everything else.

It’s particularly great if you’re already familiar with this franchise, since the film is filled with all sorts of subtle and not so subtle nods to the movies that came before it. If you know why it’s significant that a truck carrying logs drives past the camera as the cast motors down the highway, then this is probably the movie for you. Actually, it’s more than just a few subtle nods, but to tell you anything more would be a spoiler. Suffice to say, if you’re familiar with this franchise, the way this movie’s constructed will blow your mind.

For everyone else it’s really all about the kills and while those are as utterly implausible as the Final Destination movies at their worst, they’re executed in a way reminiscent of Final Destination at its best. Some of them flat out don’t make any sense, but the ones that do are terrifying, cringe-worthy stuff. The first couple of Final Destination movies were so effective because they played into a lot of our most basic, day in and day out accident fears. The big deaths involved murderous household appliances, car wrecks, and exploding planes. By the third movie they got away from that and death began constructing elaborate Rube Goldberg like mechanisms to kill people, and while that was silly fun, it was never as flat out scary as those more realistic, basic fears given form. Final Destination 5 successfully splits the difference between those two possibilities while also adding in a few new wrinkles.

One of those new wrinkles, which you’ve probably seen outlined in the trailers, involves the victims’ discovery that murder may be a way to defeat death’s designs. The idea here is that if you cheat death by escaping some pre-ordained demise, then death has a quota to fill and will come for you anyway. Except, what if you murder someone and give death a cold body to fill your slot in that quota? Then you get to live out whatever time was left on that person’s life. It’s a premise so good that the only real problem here is that the movie doesn’t do more with it. Final Destination 6? I can’t believe I’m saying this after sitting through that awful fourth film a couple of years ago, but I’m all for it.

For existing fans of the Final Destination franchise, this movie is an absolute must see. For everyone else expect a lot of gore, a few effectively fun kill scenes, and a lot of confusion while everyone around you shouts in audible surprise at what’s happening on screen. This film wouldn’t deserve the three and a half stars I’m giving it as a stand-alone movie, but it’s not a stand-alone film. Final Destination 5 is the culmination of ten years of crazy kills and scared teenagers in the making. If you’ve seen any of the other Final Destination movies, don’t miss this one.

To find out whether you should see Final Destination 5 in 2D or 3D read our To 3D Or Not To 3D analysis.

30 Minutes or Less : Review

title image 
Take it the right way when I say that its short running time is one of the best things about 30 Minutes Or Less. Coming in at a swift 83 minutes, the movie never comes close to wearing out its welcome, a crucial factor for a movie this crude, this silly, and this reliant on keeping the audience on board with its paper-thin premise. Boasting solid comedic work from all four leads, plus director Ruben Fleischer's knack for executing both humor and action, 30 Minutes or Less is a quick and dirty adventure that knows exactly how to go over the top and then quit while it's still soaring.

Stepping agilely into R-rated comedy, and playing a guy who's an even bigger jerk than Mark Zuckerberg, Jesse Eisenberg kicks off the fast pace in character as Nick, a pizza delivery guy driving like a maniac to beat the clock that says the pizza is free after half an hour. He shows up late to deliver the pie to two 14-year-olds who knew he wouldn't make it anyway, then proceeds to rip the kids off for $40 and buy some beer-- he's just that kind of guy. His childhood best friend Chet (Aziz Ansari) has the usual encouraging words about moving on and getting a real job, but Nick seems content to flirt constantly with Chet's accomplished sister (Dilshad Vadsaria), drink and smoke too much, and be one of those small-town guys you expected more from but who never goes anywhere worthwhile.

Meanwhile, at an absurd McMansion built in the boonies off lotto money, dimwits Dwayne (Danny McBride) and Travis (Nick Swardson) plan to kill Dwayne's dad for the sake of early inheritance, but in order to pay off the hitman brought in from Detroit (Michael Pena), they need a ton of cash now. Nick is their unlucky dupe, a bomb strapped to his chest with 10 hours to hold up a local bank and deliver the money. Nick is fresh from a nasty fight with Chet but visits his friend-- at his substitute teaching job, at a school filled with kids-- to ask for help. Thus the world's two least-prepared bank robbers try to execute their plan, while the world's two least competent extortionists stay on their tail; all the while Pena's very prepared, very competent hitman is heading to town looking for his cash and prepared to escalate the violence from jokey, boyish nonsense to actual bloodshed.

That's pretty much it as far as plot goes-- I told you, 30 Minutes or Less keeps it simple-- and though there's some improvisation among the two sets of friends on their respective missions, Fleischer doesn't indulge himself with overlong scenes or keeping in any more jokes than the film absolutely needed. The plot, basic and familiar as it will be, constantly drives the film forward, and though scenes are crammed with profanity and dick jokes that push the R-rating to its limit, it always feels of a piece with the rough-and-tumble characters and even the action scenes they're thrown into. It never stops being fun to see Nick's shitty car squealing around corners to get away from the cops or the bad guys, or to watch Dwayne needle Travis or Chet panic in the passenger seat; by the time one action bit or character conflict has worn itself out, it's on to the next one, the movie stepping along at a brisk but never frantic pace.

Despite a heartfelt performance from Eisenberg that gives the movie some emotional heft, 30 Minutes Or Less isn't really about anything, which makes it possible to laugh along with some goofy violence but also difficult to remember much about it once it's over. 30 Minutes or Less doesn't have the imaginative hook of Fleischer's Zombieland, and its boyish, lowbrow humor and occasional violence means it might not appeal to such a wide audience. But it's an excellent further example of Fleischer's skill behind the camera and the talent of its four leads, a funny and fast-paced blast of silly energy, willfully dumb with a clever streak that keeps it afloat just long enough.

Fright Night : Reviews

title image 
Though it is indeed a remake of a well-liked 80s movie, Fright Night feels much fresher than a lot of what has come down studio pikes this summer. Some of that comes from Marti Noxon's writing, a Buffy the Vampire Slayer alumna who, once she works through some twee tendencies in the movie's first act, does right by the movie's sassy and clever teen heroes. Some of it comes from director Craig Gillespie, who has made a film that's not really anything like his previous effort Lars and the Real Girl beyond its willingness to draw humor out of unlikely and downright bizarre situations. But the film's true gems are the performances from Colin Farrell, as the violent vampire-next-door, and David Tennant, as the Criss Angel-inspired Vegas magician who helps our hero Charley (Anton Yelchin) defeat his supernatural foe. Giving equally committed and charismatic but wildly different performances, Farrell and Tennant are the best reason to see a movie that's sometimes more trying than fun.

And because both actors don't really take over until midway through the film, the beginning of Fright Night is more of a slog, as we watch Charley get convinced by his former best friend Ed (Christopher Mintz-Plasse) that neighbor Jerry really is a vampire, not just the helpful guy next door who's really into home repairs. It takes some time for Gillespie's direction and Noxon's too-clever writing to settle into a balance between horror and humor; an entire conversation takes place between Ed and Charley in a home where we've seen Jerry feed on the family that lived there, and while you wait for something horrible to lunge from every dark corner, the scene is played for uncomfortable laughs instead.

The first section of Fright Night is also when you must adjust to the 3D, which is actually not post-conversion but suffers more from dimness than any 3D movie I've seen. Being a movie about vampires, Fright Night largely takes place at night or dark rooms, and the added 3D glasses make it virtually impossible to make out what is happening onscreen. It's a mystifying mistake, by far the biggest one in a movie that goes on to feel so fleet and self-confident; in going for realism with the dark desert nights, Gillespie has squandered all the potential of the 3D format by making his action impossible to see.

But just when Fright Night starts to seem irrevocably shaky and misguided, Jerry goes on the attack against Charley, his mom (Toni Collette) and girlfriend (Imogen Poots), blowing up their house, chasing down the minivan on a motorcycle, and handily murdering an innocent bystander. From there Charley seeks the help of Tennant's Vegas magician fraud, and Fright Night turns into the vampire-hunting quest it should have been from the beginning, suddenly funny and scary in all the right places, carried by the aforementioned brilliant performances and a real sense of playing with the vampire genre. Tennant's Peter Vincent isn't just a magician but a vampire expert with the world's largest collection of anti-vampire weapons; if Chekhov said the gun put on the wall in the first act has to go off in the third, just wait until you see what happens when all those dormant vampire weapons come into play all at once.

Yelchin eventually finds his groove as the unlikely vampire hunter, though his character arc as a callow popularity-seeker never really shakes out. And when it comes time for Charley's final confrontation with Jerry, plus a handful of other friends and neighbors struck by a vampire bite, Yelchin is convincing as a man of action, even when slightly outshone by his partner-in-arms Tennant. The fun of Fright Night takes a little too long to get going, and it's really a shame about the bad misuse of 3D, but Gillespie and Noxon are clever enough, and have cast enough skilled actors, to make this Fright Night revisit worth the effort. 

Conan the Barbarian (2011) : Review

title image 
There’s a lot to like, even admire about director Marcus Nispel’s remake of Conan the Barbarian, but it makes its biggest mistake early on when it attempts to introduce us to the title character as a 13-year-old kid. It’s not the boy that’s the problem or even the scenes they’ve written for him to be in. Those are well-crafted bits of bloody character development, anchored by another one of those underrated performances we’re used to getting from Ron Perlman, as Conan’s father. We learn everything about the man Conan’s going to grow up to be from those scenes, except that when the movie suddenly flashes forward to the adult version of the character played by heaviliy-muscled Jason Momoa, he seems like a completely different person.

Sure pint-sized Conan and big Conan have the same fearsome fighting ability, but any resemblance to the kid begins and ends there. Because we instantly flash forward to Conan as a fully formed person, there’s really no connective tissue between the two versions we see of the character. The movie attempts to solve this with some randomly inserted Morgan Freeman narration, but rather than connecting those two dissected parts of the movie together it simply introduces another element, as if the narration was from some other, third version of the Conan character.

It’s a problem Conan the Barbarian suffers from throughout its running time. Much of the movie feels disjointed, like the kind of film where things just happen and you’re left to sort through the rubble and figure out what’s been going on. Luckily, even when it’s not exactly smoothly constructed, what’s going on has balls.

They don’t make movies like this one anymore. Conan the Barbarian is nearly as gritty, bloody, and barbaric as the original film. That’s a feat I’d have sworn could simply not have been done in today’s modern environment of political correctness. Sure, it doesn’t go quite as far as the Schwarzenegger film, and a lot of that CGI blood looks pretty fake, but it goes far enough in the world of hard R brutality and boobies to earn the word “Barbarian” in its title. Normally I’m not a big stickler for that sort of thing, but this is a Conan movie. Barbarism must come with the territory, or what’s the point in making it?

Jason Momoa is pretty good too. He’s no Arnold Schwarzenegger and I sort of miss the version of the character who almost never talks, but Momoa pulls off the barbaric grunts and looks good while swinging around a sword. He’s vicious and brutal, and so is Marcus Nispel’s film.

What’s more, Conan has a few good ideas. New ideas. This isn’t just a total rehash of the movie you saw in the 80s, the script they’ve used has a fresh spin with a few specifically clever additions which really do make this attempt to resurrect the franchise completely worthwhile. Some of it’s silly and results in buildings crumbling for no reason other than to heighten tension, but a lot of it’s good. If only they ‘d found a better way to connect it all together.

Even disjointed and somewhat disheveled, Conan the Barbarian is gritty enough and brutal enough that it’s absolutely worth a look. Marcus Nispel knows how to shoot this kind of vicious battle story, and if only someone would’ve found a way to close up the cracks in its narrative, then maybe they’d have had something special.

For an in-depth analysis of Conan the Barbarian's 3D version read To 3D Or Not To 3D.

Spy Kids: All The Time In The World :Review

title image 
Almost thirty years ago, John Waters released a version of his absurd satire Polyester with a scratch and sniff card he called Odorama. The gimmick was a loving throwback to the 1960 film Scent Of A Mystery that was shown in Smell-O-Vision, but like most of Waters’ homages, the olfactory obnoxiousness actually fit the tone of the film. With a female protagonist cursed by an acute, almost uncanny sense of smell, a son who regularly got high on glue and a plot featuring a skuzzy porn theater and foot fetishes, those occasional whiffs of rancid putrescence were like horrifying and hilarious sniffs inside Polyester’s outlandish world. The film may not have needed Odorama, but it certainly benefitted from it. The same cannot be said for Spy Kids: All The Time In The World.

In theory, weird smells should suit a fourth installment of Spy KidsUp here. The basic story involves elementary school kids strapping on high tech gadgets to save the world alongside their talking dog. In many ways, the plot really is the PG, bigger budget answer to John Waters’ obscene tale of the Baltimore foot stomper. Unfortunately, Spy Kids: All The Time In The World never quite gets comfortable with that preposterous viewpoint. It dabbles in the unreasonable at times, but it’s too hellbent on shoehorning in what it naively considers to be real emotions to truly embrace its daffy premise. The result is an off-putting hybrid of exploding diapers and grown-up regrets. I can get on board with both of those things, just not in the same movie.

It all starts out fun enough. Marissa Wilson (Jessica Alba) is nine months pregnant, but like a good heroine in a kooky fantasy, she’s still hard at work trying to save the world from a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles-like villain named Tick Tock. Her water breaks mid-pursuit, but a physical trifle like that won’t stop her from completing the mission. Within minutes, the bad guy is arrested, and she’s on her way to the hospital to meet her husband Wilbur (Joel McHale). He’s not the biggest fan of his wife working so many hours as an interior decorator, but Marissa vows to give it all up to raise the baby and try to connect with her two step-children.

She’s mostly won over Cecil (Mason Cook), but Rebecca (Rowan Blanchard) is a bit of a problem, both for Marissa and the film’s tone. She misses her mother and resents her father’s wife monopolizing dad’s time. In order to even the score, she employs elaborate pranks involving salad dressing and altered hair dryers. It’s like Punk’d and The Brady Bunch had a messy baby, but the tumultuous and sitcomy relationship turns a corner after Marissa offers Rebecca an unusual piece of jewelry.

The striking red heirloom is a perfect fence-mender, but regrettably, it’s also the key to stopping the Armageddon machine. Tick Tock has broken out of prison and has joined The Timekeeper, also a discarded Ninja Turtles villain, in a scheme to speed up time. Minutes now fly by like seconds, and without Rebecca’s jewelry, there’s no way to stop the clock-altering plot. With her two stepchildren in tow along with the family dog and some frank honesty about her past, Marissa sets off to once again save the world and bring her unconventional family together.

That desired resolution eventually comes but not before a slew of false endings and a deluge of backstories. Not content to just have a good time, Spy Kids: All The Time In The World goes to great lengths to manufacture problems, dramas and fixes. Apart from Cecil and that aforementioned dog, voiced by a completely wasted Ricky Gervais, nearly every character in the film addresses some sort of moral quandary. Wilbur can’t figure out how to balance his work and home life. Marissa can’t figure out how to bond with her step-kids. Rebecca can’t figure out how to get over her mother. The Timekeeper can’t figure out how to cope with his past. Even Spy Kids veterans Juni and Carmen show up in the third act to hash out their interpersonal problems. Depth is great, but when these conversations are happening two minutes after puke bags were used to disorient henchmen, they tend to feel a bit jumpy and slow.

Robert Rodriguez is a good director. He’s made some wonderful movies in the past, but focus has to be altered based on subject matter. Traditionally, it is better for characters to have heart and clearly defined reasons for their actions, but in a film as absurd as Spy Kids 4, those specifics don’t really need to waffle, alter and say something bigger about life. More is not always better, especially when it suffocates the joy that should be inherent in a project like this.

It’s not a total loss. There are a handful of scenes in Spy Kids 4 that really do work. Somewhere, hidden beneath all the forced hugs, there’s a lot of fun to be had, but ultimately, that digging just isn’t worth it, even if you do get some cool scents along the way. 

Our Idiot Brother :Review

title image 
Paul Rudd's character Ned in Our Idiot Brother is the kind of guileless, selfless soul we all imagine we could be in our better moments, happy to help others and live as peacefully as possible. His sisters, on the other hand, are the selves we know we actually are-- selfish, misguided, intolerant and often downright mean. The conflict between Rudd and his family is what's supposed to make up the comedy of Our Idiot Brother, which takes fantastic actors and a lot of promising situations and squanders virtually all of it. It's not just the long stretches of the movie that go by without a single laugh-- that's OK for indies like this-- but how many jokes fail to land, and how much of the film just feels like a giant missed opportunity.

Rudd has proven over and over again that he's infinitely likable onscreen, and his puppydogish desire to please and be loved is the best reason to see Our Idiot Brother, especially since director Jesse Peretz and writers Evgenia Peretz and David Schisgall have built up a ridiculous series of caricatures to surround him. Ned kicks off the movie by getting thrown in the slammer for selling weed to a uniformed police officer, an idiot move that, in large part thanks to Rudd's performance, seems totally understandable in context. Eight months later he's set free but kicked off his farm by his bitchy ex-girlfriend (Kathryn Hahn, done no favors by the material) and forced to crash, one by one, with all three of his sisters, who are vaguely worried about the lack of direction in Ned's life but are far too self-absorbed to actually do much about it.

You see, each of Ned's sisters has problems in their lives that only he, with his unvarnished honesty and sense of childlike wonder, can solve. Liz (Emily Mortimer) is married to a philandering jerk (Steve Coogan-- great casting) and keeps her eight-year-old son on an insanely tight leash; Miranda (Elizabeth Banks) is pursuing her magazine writing career at the cost of all dignity while also stringing along her adoring next door neighbor (Adam Scott) as if they're "just friends"; and Natalie (Zooey Deschanel) is about to move in with her butch lawyer girlfriend Cindy (Rashida Jones, unconvincingly butch) but is clearly already freaked out by the commitment. We're told early on that Natalie's not actually gay, just bi-curious, and she spends a lot of time with a foxy artist played by Hugh Dancy… if you're filling in the blanks from there, you're already smarter than Our Idiot Brother thinks you are.

Peretz and his co-writers clearly know the many segments of well-off New York where the movie takes place, and occasional jabs at indulgent Park Slope parent culture, high-flying Vanity Fair offices or awful Williamsburg performance art ring very true, especially with Rudd's hippie character thrown into the mix. But the plot, which takes over especially in the packed and obnoxious third-act finale, just drags and drags, setting up conflicts that we can instantly tell how to resolve, and clashing Rudd against a set of three sisters who are so self-absorbed and mean they don't stand a chance at earning the audience's sympathy. Aside from Mortimer's Liz and Jones's Cindy, who are mostly victims of their terrible choices in partners, the women in the movie are awful people, generally undeserving of the happy ending Rudd helps them find. Even when Banks manages to establish a nice rapport with both Rudd and Scott-- who get one excellent, funny scene to themselves as well-- the character of Miranda is written with a remarkable lack of sympathy. Ned may love his sisters unconditionally, but the movie he's in is a lot less forgiving.

It's a shame to see Rudd, whose best performances often involve stepping back to let others take over, given a role that lets him hit it out of the park in a movie that never comes close to matching him. New Yorkers can get a kick out of seeing so much of our beautiful, silly city skewered, but it's hard to imagine what most others would get out of the movie beyond an overwhelming sense that they could have done better. 

Colombiana :Review

 
title image 
Luc Besson is responsible for two of the greatest assassin films of all time. In Leon: The Professional and La Femme Nikita the French writer/director presented not just remarkable fight scenes and high tension, but rich characters living isolated lives and resisting close relationships. With such amazing credits to his name it’s hard to understand what exactly what was going through his mind while he and Robert Mark Kamen were writing Colombiana, a movie as shallow and unoriginal as they come.

The film opens in Colombia where a young girl named Cataleya Restrepo (Zoe Saldana) sees her parents murdered at the hands of mobsters commanded by a man named Don Luis (Beto Benites). Managing to survive on her own, she travels to Chicago to live with her hard-edged uncle (Cliff Curtis) and has him train her as a killer. After fifteen years she has become an elite assassin with plans for revenge against those that took her family away, but with a smart FBI agent (Lennie James) right on her tail, she needs to execute before it’s too late.

If that sounds like an intensely generic plot outline that because it is, and at no point during Colombiana does the movie try to right that wrong. Everything about the film, from the characters to the structure, is cribbed from a thousand other examples of the revenge subgenre. But even when the movie tries to copy something that worked in Leon: The Professional or La Femme Nikita it’s done in a haphazard way that ends up being a detriment to the film. Much like how Leon had Mathilda and Nikita had Marco, Cataleya has a relationship with a normal person, an artist played by Michael Vartan, but the script makes little attempt to establish their personal connection. Instead of being an access point to a world outside of death and guns, it simply looks like he’s her occasional booty call.

Then there’s the story’s motivator: Cataleya’s mission for revenge. Again, this is where any semblance of character development would have been great, but a complete lack of exposition also hurts the film. After the protagonist has grown up and become a cleaner it’s shown that she she tags all her victims to get Don Luis's attention, but it's never explained how the men she murdered are connected to the Colombian kingpin.

That’s nothing, however, compared to the fact that Cataleya and Don Luis never share a single scene together in the entire film. Instead, the hero’s contact with her enemies is entirely limited to a conversation she has with Luis’ right-hand-man, Marco (Jordi Mollà), who was present when her parents were killed. Possibly a result of the film’s PG-13 rating, there’s no moment where the audience learns to despise the villain, like when Gary Oldman slaughters Natalie Portman’s family in The Professional. Moviegoers can understand why Cataleya wants revenge, but because the plot and characters are so undeveloped they’re never given a reason to be invested.

The action and fight sequences, shot competently by director Olivier Megaton, prevent the film from completely flat lining. While the movie doesn’t have many insane, explosive scenes that make it feel as though the characters have jet fuel pumping through their veins, the filmmaker succeeds in doing a lot with a little and always provides the audience with spatial awareness and context. The bigger action beats are largely relegated to the final act of the film, but Megaton also does a solid job of building tension while Cataleya executes two hits in the middle of the film, one in a prison and another in a Mexican estate.

Action aside, what ultimately kills the film is a complete lack of originality or initiative. The plot and characters are paint-by-numbers and even those elements are put together sloppily. The entire premise hangs on the idea that an assassin with a need revenge for revenge is more than enough for audiences, but that’s simply not true. A movie needs depth, it needs motive and it needs emotion. Colombiana has none of these things.

Don't Be Afraid Of The Dark :Review


title image
Don’t Be Afraid Of The Dark is very good with details. Its setting--an old, partially renovated mansion--is perfectly constructed for a horror film. Its cast is very small and tight knit, lacking the usual hot, frivolous and unimportant supporting players. Its back story is wonderful, effectively balancing old money, eccentric creativity and the creepiness of life before electricity. And its visual style, so sleek and modern without sacrificing eeriness, is a ringing endorsement for the film’s director Troy Nixey, who towers over most of his counterparts in aesthetic skill. But despite all the wonderful extras, Don't Be Afraid of the Dark completely loses sight of the fact that its central plot doesn’t work at all.

Watching Don’t Be Afraid Of The Dark is like seeing a hot shot rookie in his first big league plate appearance line out really hard to third base. You can tell someday director Nixey might eventually make something great, but none of that skill can change the fact that his first full length movie is beset by boring leads, a running time twenty minutes too long and perhaps worst of all, villains that just aren’t that scary. Don’t Be Afraid Of The Dark worked almost forty years ago with a few alterations as an ABC made-for-TV movie, but this rehash never should have been made.

Sally Hirst (Bailee Madison) has been discarded. Of course, her mother probably wouldn’t tell it that way. She’d say she was concerned about her daughter’s behavior and felt living with her father (Guy Pearce) would do the little girl some good. Those purported motivations wouldn’t change the isolation Sally feels as she first meets her father’s new girlfriend Kim (Katie Holmes). She’s an interior designer working with Sally’s dad on a full scale restoration of Blackwood Manor. The elegant retreat was once owned by famed nature artist Emerson Blackwood, but he disappeared into the basement generations ago just a few days after his son went missing, leaving the property in disrepair.

Colossal and castle-like, the home includes multiple floors, numerous bedrooms, a Beauty And The Beast-like library and a basement that’s been sealed off and hidden for decades. Sally discovers it a few days after settling in, but the lead handyman Mr. Harris (Jack Thompson) cryptically warns the family against going inside. He’s quickly outvoted, and the bottom floor is broken into. It contains many of Emerson Blackwood’s last paintings, a mysterious fireplace bolted shut and strange voices only Sally seems to hear. They beg her to open up the enclosure, and feeling friendless and alone, she willingly complies, unleashing a swarm of goblin-like menaces as child-thirsty as they are afraid of the light.

What follows is the standard horror fare you might expect--close calls are had, flashlights jam, a child isn’t believed and a grandiose finale is set in motion that involves a war against undead forces. It’s occasionally unsettling, but mostly, it’s just unaffecting. Viewers are never really given a reason to root for Sally and Kim beyond an inherent urge to see human overcome beast. The father Alex is almost a complete throwaway, simply occupying the role of work-obsessed, uninvested skeptic, and while some effort is made to build a complex relationship between Sally and Kim, there's not enough screen time to push it beyond mere plot point. Maybe if the monsters were something special the film could dig itself out of the hole, but they kind of look like Golem was hit with the Honey I Shrunk The Kids ray and then cloned dozens of times. They're a whole lot less impressive than Blackwood Manor.

Don’t Be Afraid Of The Dark does a wonderful job of using its best feature, the estate, as another character. Camera shots criss-cross through vents to change floors. The beasts use pipes and the house's ventilation system to move around. Sliding bookcases are used as weapons, intricate gardens and tall trees are used as both mental and physical escapes. The sheer grandiosity of it all is mesmerizing to watch, but ultimately, a breathtaking mansion still isn’t a worthwhile home without interesting characters to live in it.

For horror aficionados, Don’t Be Afraid Of The Dark is probably worth seeing because of all it does right, but for everyone else, there’s just too much wrong to spend ten dollars
Source

A Good Old Fashioned Orgy :Review

title image 
The upside of A Good Old Fashioned Orgy's long delay on its way to theaters is that many of its stars-- including Lucy Punch, Leslie Bibb and Nick Kroll-- are far more famous now than they were when the movie was filmed in 2008. But delayed movies, comedies especially, have a way of earning that kind of delay, and though there's plenty of talent and a handful of good jokes, it's largely a promising idea in search of writer-directors who know where to take it. Peter Huyck and Alex Gregory, making their screenwriting and directing debuts, consistently bungle everything from the timing of jokes to plot threads that seem insultingly obvious, making a film that's just good enough to set the audience up for laughs that just aren't there.

That's not to say the movie isn't agreeable enough, and it's not nearly as terrible as the long delay and the desperately raunchy premise would suggest. But Sudeikis has been in similar territory once already this summer, in Horrible Bosses, and it's far weaker stuff here. Sudeikis plays Eric, a slightly spoiled thirty-something who's spent years throwing ragers at a Hamptons house owned by his dad (Don Johnson, for some reason), and decides it's time for one last giant party before dad sells the place after Labor Day Weekend. Past party themes have usually been along the lines of the "White Trash Bash" that opens the movie, but Eric somehow makes the leap in logic that it's high time he and his best pals since high school have an orgy.

Very, very creaky screenwriting gambits get all the characters to the point of agreeing to the orgy, but in a movie that could have just gone right after the raunch, it's at least nice to have them there. But even though many of the characters-- therapist and bad-relationship-prone Alison (Lake Bell), hung-up-on-Eric Sue (Michelle Borth), all-over horndog Mike (Tyler Labine)-- have good enough reasons to join the orgy, the characters tend to range from irritating to insufferable. Whether overacting, as Lindsay Sloane does playing the innocent and awkward Laura, or coasting by on charm, as Sudeikis does pretty much effortlessly, the actors either can't or won't elevate the material, handed iffy jokes and a shaky screenplay and simply shrugging their shoulders and running with it. It's not just that the jokes don't land as well as they should and comedy bits never go anywhere, but these people never even feel like friends, much less the kind of lifelong pals who would throw an orgy together and get through intact.

As the movie counts down the weeks until the big day, various pieces fall into place to make the orgy possible, but Eric is also struggling to maintain what looks like a real new romance with his real estate agent Kelly (Bibb), who understandably shouldn't know about the forthcoming group sex party. There's also the newly married couple Glenn (Will Forte) and Kate (Lucy Punch) to gum up the works, the two of them demanding to be included despite their new bond; Forte and Punch, maybe because they appear in such small doses, pull off the balancing act of playing characters who are both irritating and funny. There's also a trip to a local underground sex club where a bearded David Koechner shows Eric how it's done, and though the scene milks laughs out of how uncomfortable a sex club would probably be, it also goes for easy shots at, gasp, old and unattractive people daring to have sex.

When it finally comes time for the orgy to happen, the movie admirably sticks to its guns in a way a more mainstream comedy probably couldn't have. Aside from one lame moment of gay panic the characters are both awkward and refreshingly open to the adventure, and though the writing isn't nearly strong enough to take advantage of the situation, each of the characters-- annoying as they are-- do eventually come into their own by the end. Aside from a handful of raunchy jokes and a lot of nudity, though, A Good Old Fashioned Orgy plays it too safe, when it had the cast and the premise to do a lot more.

The Debt : Review


title image
There are a lot of figurative scars defining The Debt, an action-heavy drama that takes place largely in East Berlin in 1966 and Tel Aviv in 1997. The story of three Mossad agents on a mission to bring an ex-Nazi to justice, the movie is suffused with scars from the Holocaust, from the divide of East and West Germany, from the nascent and already struggling Israeli state, and more obliquely, the victims of the fictional ex-Nazi doctor called "The Surgeon of Birkenau." There's also one very literal scar on the face of Rachel, played by Jessica Chastain in the 60s scenes and Helen Mirren in the 90s; in the first 10 minutes of The Debt we see how Rachel got the ugly scar, then spend the rest of the film unraveling what we saw and how it affects the lives of everyone involved.

Twisty, maybe a little overly complicated but also undeniably compelling, The Debt is at its essence a spy story, but poised at a unique point in history that gives it real poignance. Our three Mossad agents-- Rachel is joined on the East Berlin mission by ambitious Stephan (Marton Csokas) and quietly determined David (Sam Worthington)-- experience the same romantic entanglements and moments of doubt that any three young people on a mission might, but it's those unspoken, unseen scars that drive them. Each of them survived the Holocaust as children and all lost family, and in joining a Mossad mission to hunt down and bring to trial Dr. Dieter Vogel (Jesper Christensen), they are exacting a state-sanctioned revenge that's also deeply personal.

We learn in an early flashback that the Berlin mission ended with Vogel escaping, injuring Rachel (and scarring her face), only to be shot in the back by Rachel at the last minute. In 1997 the daughter that Rachel and Stephan (played as an older man by Tom Wilkinson) had together has written a book about their experiences, and it's clear that both of them have become national heroes as a result of their story. Then there's David (played by Ciaran Hinds), who is on his way to the book party when, in front of Stephan, he launches himself in front of a speeding truck. It will be nearly the end of the movie before we know why.

The script, adapted by Matthew Vaughn and Jane Goldman (the team behind Kick-Ass), along with Peter Straughn, from a 2007 Israeli film, skitters between the 60s and the 90s to work up a good sense of mystery. Then it plunges us claustrophobically into the East Berlin mission, where Rachel and David-- total strangers to each other-- must pretend to be married, and Rachel visits Vogel's gynecology office under the guise of being a patient. We've see many female spies use their feminine wiles to get close to the enemy, but with her feet in the stirrups and Vogel's hand on her cervix, Rachel is going to extraordinary lengths, and director John Madden brings us into both her discomfort and steely resolve to get the job done. When the plan goes awry and Vogel winds up a prisoner in the agents' apartment, he uses this intimate access to get under her skin more figuratively, and The Debt's frank exploration of Rachel's femininity as both a weapon and a liability becomes one of its more compelling underlying themes.

Eventually what's happening on the surface becomes a little less interesting-- a love triangle is formed, secret alliances are revealed, and in 1997, Mirren's Rachel goes on one last mission that will either unearth or bury the biggest secret of all. In one way it's all standard spy movie stuff, but it's everything roiling under the surface that keeps The Debt so intriguing-- David's tightly-wound insistence on getting the job done, the weight of secrets on Rachel's face in both eras, the crackling, unspoken tension in each agent's strained conversation with their Nazi quarry. Worthington, a constantly underestimated actor, is tense and slightly menacing even when David is consumed by love, and Csokas's cocky Stephan morphs fascinatingly into Wilkinson's version, a politician who automatically owns the room even confined to a wheelchair. Hinds isn't even a close match for Worthington physically-- he actually looks more like Csokas, which is confusing-- but he matches the intensity of Worthington's performance even in his few short scenes.

With its complicated, time-jumping plot and occasional moments of excellently done tension, The Debt is a movie that's worth sinking into, with Madden and his extraordinary actors drawing the audience into the film's coziness cut with paranoia. It's the rare kind of thriller that's even more interesting below the surface than the high-stakes plot that drives it.
Source

Friends With Benefits (2011) Review

http://cdn-images.hollywood.com/cs/134x201/106610H1.jpg
I came to Friends With Benefits with the hope that writer-director Will Gluck would take aim at the romantic comedy with the same piquant, mischievous zeal he displayed in 2010’s Easy A, a film that earned him comparisons to such hallowed figures as Alexander Payne and John Hughes. And he does—for a while, at least. The film springs from the gate with a fun revisionist élan, promising to lay waste to the stale conventions that have long characterized the genre. A promise that, in the end, is sadly unfulfilled.

Attractive twentysomethings Dylan (Justin Timberlake) and Jamie (Mila Kunis) first meet as business associates—he’s a savvy web designer, she’s a spunky headhunter who lures him to New York to work for GQ. Both happen to be recovering from nasty breakups (he was dumped by a Jon Mayer obsessive, played by Emma Stone; her by a cloying slacker, played by Andy Samberg), and they bond over their shared exasperation with relationships and romance.

One night, wallowing in their mutual malaise over beer and pizza and an insipid rom-com (a fictitious film-within-a-film featuring uncredited Jason Segel and Rashida Jones), they hit on an idea: Why not use each other to sate our primal urges, without all the hassles and complications that committed relationships entail? (That this is the first time either has pondered cohabitation strikes me as a bit disingenuous: Both rank among the upper-percentile of desirable people; surely the notion might have at least briefly occurred to them before?)

The pack is formalized by an oath sworn over a iPad bible app (the film is gratuitously tech-chic, to the point of employing flash mobs as plot devices), and consummated in one of the film’s funniest scenes. Freed from any pretensions of romance, and from any fears of embarrassment or rejection, they approach the act from the perspective of two people seeking only to maximize their enjoyment. (He encourages her to look at it as a game of tennis.) They calmly recite their preferences, idiosyncrasies, and deal-breakers, like agents negotiating a contract; during the deed, they critique each others’ performance with utter candor, offering helpful guidance when it’s called for. (She shows particular disdain for a technique called “The Tornado.”)

They’re hanging out, they’re having sex; the only thing missing, obviously, is intimacy. It’s inevitable—at least in the peculiar moral universe inhabited by studio rom-coms—that one or both of them will come to crave it. And that’s when complications arise, both for Dylan and Jamie and for the filmmakers. Faced with two roads, Gluck opts to take the more-traveled one, and Friends With Benefits gradually—and disappointingly—yields to convention, affirming many of the rom-com tropes and clichés it initially seemed intent on skewering.

That the film is funny—wry and quick and (at least initially) irreverent—helps alleviate the let-down of its second-half surrender to formula. Kunis and Timberlake make for able verbal sparring partners their chemistry is real and their interplay natural and unforced. Accustomed to smaller roles and guest-hosting spots on SNL, Timberlake acquits himself nicely in Friends With Benefits, even if he at times appears outmatched by Kunis. I’m not quite prepared to forgive him for The Love Guru, but I’m getting there.
Source

Crazy, Stupid, Love. (2011) Review

http://cdn-images.hollywood.com/cs/134x201/097878H1.jpgThe ensemble dramedy Crazy, Stupid, Love. has the makings of greatness. Its cast brims with nimble and likable actors, including Steve Carrell, Julianne Moore, Ryan Gosling, and Emma Stone, and its screenplay, written by Dan Fogelman (Cars, Tangled), is replete with moments alternately touching, funny, clever, and heartbreaking. So why, then, is the end product ultimately so unsatisfying? Perhaps it’s because the film, as constructed by directors Glenn Ficarra and John Requa, is a mess, a jumble of disparate plot elements and shifting tones, its whole significantly less than the sum of its parts.

Crazy, Stupid, Love. begins with a breakup: Emily (Moore), after 25 years of marriage to Cal (Carrell), declares to him in a busy restaurant that she wants a divorce, then subsequently admits to an affair. As Cal and Emily grapple with love’s demise, their thirteen-year-old son, Robbie (Jonah Bobo), is feeling its first stirrings, having developed a formidable crush on the family’s seventeen-year-old babysitter, Jessica (Analeigh Tipton). (He remains undeterred even after she walks in on him doing, well, what thirteen-year-old boys do.) Alas, Robbie’s feelings appear doomed to remain unrequited, as the girl only has eyes for Cal. The implications of her crush, to which Cal is entirely oblivious (this isn’t American Beauty 2), aren’t made clear until much later.

Indeed, the implications of much of what happens in Crazy, Stupid, Love. aren’t made clear until much later. The film meanders about – without clear aim or purpose – for a good portion of its running time, drifting back and forth between Cal’s story and those of its supporting players, as Ficarra and Requa seem more intent on laying the groundwork for a Stunning Third-Act Twist than crafting a coherent and compelling narrative.

Devastated by his wife’s revelations, Cal sulks nightly at a swanky uptown bar, where he earns the sympathy of its resident player, Jacob (Gosling). A sharp-dressed, blunt-spoken dilettante, he takes on the gloomy, pathologically uncool 44-year-old as a kind of apprentice, upgrading his wardrobe and schooling him on his pick-up strategy, which involves not so much seducing women as overwhelming them. The efforts soon pay off when Cal beds a daffy middle-school teacher (Marisa Tomei), followed by a bevy of anonymous bar babes.

But just as Cal enjoys promiscuity’s first fruits, he finds himself pining for Emma, whom he still loves, and who has clearly come to regret her dalliance. Crazy, Stupid, Love. wants us to believe the two are soulmates destined to be reunited, but nothing about their scenes together suggests this to be true. The best the film can offer are wistful tales from the couples’ days as high-school sweethearts – surely not the stuff of which successful marriages are made. The most telling statement on their relationship is made in the opening sequence, when Cal would rather leap from a moving vehicle than listen to his wife talk.

More credible is the unexpected bond Jacob forms with Hannah (Stone), a canny law-school graduate first seen flatly rejecting him (she’s the only woman in the film to do so) earlier in the film. After her attorney boyfriend (Josh Groban) proves a bust, she runs (literally) into his arms, and shortly thereafter to his posh bachelor pad. But what starts out as a one-night-stand turns into an all-night conversation. Hannah first presses him to reveal the steps of his seduction routine, then to catalog his list of late-night Sharper Image purchases. When he complies, it feels like a requiem. Can a scrofulous cad really be redeemed over the course of one evening? He can if he’s Ryan Gosling – and if his redeemer is Emma Stone.

The charm of that scene is nearly enough to redeem Crazy, Stupid, Love. Then comes the Big Twist, the point of which is debatable, the absurdity of which is not. Afterward, the film, which has heretofore alternated between sharp insight and sentimental contrivance, opts exclusively for the latter. The only thing missing from its sap-soaked climax is a slow-clap.
Source